Skip to main content

Cost Audit Awareness in India

I came across a discussion topic by Murari Limaye on cma india discussion board with a request to brain storm on it. The topic is very interesting and reproduce the questions below:

The points initialy came in my mind are...

1. We have to prove that the Cost Audit is necessary because it helps to Government, Industries,Stake holders.
2. What are the advantages of Cost Audit to these institutes?
3. Are the reports are used by the Government to control the prices that we do not know as it is kept secret.
4. If required we have to give presentation on how to use the Cost Audit Report para to para.

5. Is the current Cost Audit report is too large and unrequired information is to be removed?
6. Is this report is to be given to shareholders also?
7. Why all the manufacturing industries and service industries are not covered for cost record maintainance as well as cost Audit Report? and so on.....


I have never been a supporter of too much controls on business. But at the same time control should exist so that all the stakeholders are protected. Take a simple case how controls are waste of time for you as a person. You come from US to India and land on airport. You need to convert US dollars to Rupees and you have 50 $ 10 notes. If you have exchanged in any US airport, it would have taken you maximum 3 minutes on the counter but the same process will take more than 15 minutes. What would happen, if you 5th person in the queue.

The reason, you have to write all the currency numbers that you submit for exchange and then you are going to get Indian Rupees for it. Sheer waste or time and energy... That is what is control all about.

My thoughts on Cost & Management Accounting practises and way ahead is as follows:

Dear Murari,

My thoughts on the subject are :

  • Cost Audit and Management Accounting are two different aspect and we have been stressing persistently on Cost Audit and its importance rather Management Accounting. The stakeholders of information on Cost Audit are two few ie. govt. authorities and practising cost accountants whereas the management accounting will be the Directors, all levels of management of the company.
  • The institute and the members have to create awareness that good management accounting practises and disclosures in Annual Statement of that company gives a confidence to their stakeholders viz. Shareholders, Customers, Vendors, Govt. Authorities that their interests are safeguarded. This can equated to Audit Committee and Internal Audit disclosures to be the made in Annual Reports. Our institute should pursue to get that included as a legal provision of healthy practises followed by the companies and the directors should comment in their report. This legal provision in direction will enlarge the scope of management accounting in India and will gear up the companies to be competitive.
  • ICWAI has come up with two few standards. This may leaves scope for creative accounting practises. In service industry, focus is on labour accounting i.e. accounting of utilisation of time. Are there any standards how to show them or record them ?
  • In my opinion, the Cost Audit Report will be of no interest to shareholder since they are more bothered about dividends and what is the prospect of the investment.
  • You are quite right in pointing out that Cost Accounting rules should be available for service industries. ICWAI has to come with drafts and discussion papers on Cost & Management Rules/Records/Practises on the industries that are not covered by Cost Accounting Rules. It is always good to have something in place and it is voluntary for the companies to follow.
I have stressed earlier in the discussions in yahoogroups that ICWAI has to come up with the task force to encourage popular accounting packages in India to support Cost Accounting Record Rules and advice them wherever necessary. Accredit some of the software packages that the companies can get their reports/records as per Cost Accounting Rules. This will help to penetrate cost accounting practises in small and medium sized companies in India.

India is a very large market. So take a bite at a time

Regards,

Santosh Puthran

AICWA





1 comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made.

Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory.


Areas of consequence:
A Standard Costing

Throughput Accounting

Throughput accounting (TA) is an alternative to cost accounting proposed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt. It is not based on Standard Costing or Activity Based Costing (ABC). Throughput Accounting is not costing and it does not allocate costs to products and services. It can be viewed as business intelligence for profit maximization. Conceptually throughput accounting seeks to increase the velocity at which products move through an organization by eliminiating bottlenecks within the organization.


Cost (or Management) accounting is an organization's internal method used to measure efficiency. Since no one outside the organization uses such internal accounts for investment or other decisions, any methods that an organization finds helpful can be used.


Throughput accounting improves profit performance with better management decisions by using measurements that more closely reflect the effect of decisions on three critical monetary variables (throughput, inventory, and operating expense — defin…

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations.
According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change: Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business)Misunderstanding(communication problems; inadequate information)Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work)Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to change: Education and Communication - Where there is a lack…