Skip to main content

Management accounting standards-Initiative.

Author: Juergen H. Daum
Subject: Draft for a proposal of cooperation between European controlling / management accounting associations
in order to establish “International Controlling / Management Accounting Standards”
Approved by the Managing Committee of the IGC: January 2006
Why Do We Need International Management Accounting
Standards?
In most European countries, International Financial Accounting Standards (IFRS) have created a
new era of accounting and financial reporting. Many companies that are applying IFRS for the
first time experience a sharp move away from their past accounting traditions - such as from the
traditional continental European principle of protecting creditors or from the caution principle
(value assets at the lowest possible value, value liabilities at the highest possible value) to full
shareholder value orientation and to the principle of “fair value” in accounting.
Fair value accounting, in particular, is confronting accountants and auditors with a major
challenge: they are no longer able to value assets and to test for possible asset impairment (for
example, impairment of the book value of certain assets such as intangible assets and goodwill
with their fair value) without the support of (business) controllers and management accountants,
who provide reliable and “testable” planning data. Furthermore, management needs to put a new
focus on their internal controlling and management accounting systems to better support the
external IFRS view and to steer the business proactively.
We, therefore, the board members of the International Controller Verein (ICV) and the
Managing Committee of the IGC, believe that the time has come for International Controlling
Standards / International Management Accounting Standards.
Mission of the Proposed Initiative
Europe is rich in well-tested, highly advanced management accounting and controlling concepts.
However, each management accounting tradition has thus far been developed and applied more
or less in a specific national context. A huge potential to shape the management accounting and
controlling practice globally remains unused and unexploited. We therefore propose a
cooperation initiative that addresses all European controlling and management accounting
associations, as far as possible with the support of the EU. Its mission:
- to bring the major players in the controlling / management accounting scene in Europe
together for such a pan-European initiative
- to establish one European standard for management accounting and controlling by
combing the strengths of the different approaches
- to take the lead in defining International Management Accounting Standards
- to create enough momentum to attract non-European parties to join the initiative in a
second step
Possible Next Steps
- First meeting of representatives of European controlling / management accounting
associations in first half of 2006. Intended result: agreement on joint “letter of intent”
and roadmap.
- Create a working committee of representatives of the different controlling / management
accounting associations that should work out a first version of “International
Management Accounting Standards” by mid-2007.


Popular posts from this blog

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made.

Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory.


Areas of consequence:
A Standard Costing

Throughput Accounting

Throughput accounting (TA) is an alternative to cost accounting proposed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt. It is not based on Standard Costing or Activity Based Costing (ABC). Throughput Accounting is not costing and it does not allocate costs to products and services. It can be viewed as business intelligence for profit maximization. Conceptually throughput accounting seeks to increase the velocity at which products move through an organization by eliminiating bottlenecks within the organization.


Cost (or Management) accounting is an organization's internal method used to measure efficiency. Since no one outside the organization uses such internal accounts for investment or other decisions, any methods that an organization finds helpful can be used.


Throughput accounting improves profit performance with better management decisions by using measurements that more closely reflect the effect of decisions on three critical monetary variables (throughput, inventory, and operating expense — defin…

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations.
According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change: Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business)Misunderstanding(communication problems; inadequate information)Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work)Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to change: Education and Communication - Where there is a lack…