Skip to main content

CGA Canada and ACCA working together

ACCA and CGA-Canada Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA)

Related Information

The MRA between CGA-Canada and ACCA not only brings together two international accounting associations with similar values and approaches, it reflects the continuing globalization of the profession. The agreement provides a mechanism for members to become designated by the other association. It also formalizes the relationship between two internationally active professional accounting bodies.

The accounting profession is experiencing growth worldwide, reflecting the demand for accredited professional accountants who have expertise in international accounting standards. Both ACCA and CGA-Canada believe that the profession is best served by partnerships which promote global standards, and enhance the value of accountants in the workplace and by qualifications which provide opportunity for talented people to develop skills required by employers.

CGA-Canada experienced a 6.4% increase in the number of students and members in 2005-2006. ACCA has 260,000 students and 110,000 members in 170 countries – an increase in total numbers of over 75,000 students and 22,500 members since 2001. ACCA’s growth is helping it to achieve its 2010 goal, to be the leading global professional accountancy body by reputation, influence and size.

This is not the first time CGA and ACCA have worked together. This agreement follows on the heels of a joint ACCA/CGA research project on small business regulation. Findings were published in two reports: the CGA authored Tackling Compliance: Small Business and Regulation in Canada and the ACCA report: SMEs, Regulation and the Role of the Accountant. The research was publicly launched at events in Ottawa and London.

Another area of shared interest is corporate sustainability - CGA-Canada and ACCA have both worked to draw attention to the importance of this topic. In June, 2005, CGA-Canada released Measuring Up: A Study on Corporate Sustainability Reporting in Canada. In a similar vein, ACCA has a long-established reputation in the area of sustainability reporting. In 1991, it was the first organization to introduce awards for environmental reporting and is now involved in sustainability awards in over 20 countries, including Australia, Hong Kong, Ireland, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, South Africa, Sri Lanka, UK, Canada and the U.S.

The MRA now in place is a natural progression of shared experience and common areas of interest. This agreement adds value for members of both associations, as they avail themselves of opportunities provided by a dual designation. In addition, it strengthens the international accounting profession by establishing a link between two associations with a mutual interest in trust, integrity and high professional standards.

If you are a CGA and would like further information on the MRA between CGA-Canada and ACCA, go to and log in to PD Network.

If you are an ACCA member and would like further information on the MRA, Visit ACCA Website. Click here

Blog Contributed by RV


santoshputhran said…
It is Win-Win situation for the members of both the bodies. This can be only achieved when the standards of both the bodies are high with high membership base. Then they talk like partners promoting their joint interest.

Popular posts from this blog

Poll : Does CIMA, UK qualification add value

Poll : Does pursuing CIMA, UK qualification add value to a member of ICWAI, India ? Vote on the poll and share your thoughts by commenting the blog. Poll: Vote here I feel that if you are a member of ICWAI and you pursue CIMA, UK qualification, you are not adding any value to your skills since you will be learning the same. Once you are qualified, you are still a Cost & Management Accountant but from UK. For an employer, I would still have same skills and training on Management Accounting. However if you pursue qualification like Company Secretary or CPA or ACCA , your skills are enhanced with the knowledge gained during training and passing of exams. After qualification, you are bound to follow the CPD programs of ICWAI and other institute. In competitive world, employer look for people with multiple skills. Which one promotes you as professional better against your name: AICWA, ACMA or AICWA, ACS or AICWA, CPA or AICWA, ACCA Widgets Regards, Santosh

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made. Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory. Areas of consequence: A Standard

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change : Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business) Misunderstanding (communication problems; inadequate information) Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work) Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to cha