Skip to main content


‘Lowballing’ is the ‘loss-leading’ practice in which auditors compete for clients by reducing their fees for statutory audits. Lower audit fees are then compensated by the auditor carrying out more lucrative non-audit work (e.g. consultancy and tax advice). Audits may even be offered for free. Such ‘predatory pricing’ may undercut an incumbent auditor to secure an appointment into which higher price consultancy services may be sold.

Ethical risks

There is a risk of incompetence if the non-audit work does not materialise and the lowballing firm comes under pressure to cut corners or resort to irregular practices (e.g. the falsification of audit working papers) in order to ‘keep within budget’. However, a lack of audit quality may only be discovered if the situation arises that the company collapses and the auditors
are charged with negligence.

If, rather than comprise the quality of the audit, an audit firm substantially increases audit fees, a fee dispute could arise. In this case the client might refuse to pay the higher fee. It could be difficult then for the firm to take the matter to arbitration if the client was misled. Thus an advocacy threat may arise. Financial dependence is a direct incentive that threatens independence. A self-interest threat therefore arises when, having secured the audit, the audit firm needs the client to retain its services in order to recoup any losses initially incurred. The provision of many other services gives rise to a self-review threat (as well as a self-interest threat).

Sufficiency of current ethical guidance

In current ethical guidance, the fact that an accountancy firm quotes a lower fee than other tendering firms is not improper, providing that the prospective client is not misled about:

– the precise range of services that the quoted fee is intended to cover; and
– the likely level of fees for any other work undertaken.

This is clearly insufficient to prevent the practice of lowballing.

Legal prohibitions on the provision of many non-audit services (e.g. bookkeeping, financial information systems design and implementation, valuation services, actuarial services, internal audit (outsourced), human resource services for executive positions, investment and legal services) should make lowballing a riskier pricing strategy. This may curb the tendency to lowball.

Lowballing could be eliminated if, for example, auditors were required to act ‘exclusively as auditors’. Although regulatory environments have moved towards this there is not a total prohibition on non-audit services.


ACCA 2006 answer paper

Highballing and Lowballing in Audit Pricing: the Impact of Audit Error


Popular posts from this blog

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made.

Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory.

Areas of consequence:
A Standard Costing

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations.
According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change: Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business)Misunderstanding(communication problems; inadequate information)Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work)Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to change: Education and Communication - Where there is a lack…

Throughput Accounting

Throughput accounting (TA) is an alternative to cost accounting proposed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt. It is not based on Standard Costing or Activity Based Costing (ABC). Throughput Accounting is not costing and it does not allocate costs to products and services. It can be viewed as business intelligence for profit maximization. Conceptually throughput accounting seeks to increase the velocity at which products move through an organization by eliminiating bottlenecks within the organization.

Cost (or Management) accounting is an organization's internal method used to measure efficiency. Since no one outside the organization uses such internal accounts for investment or other decisions, any methods that an organization finds helpful can be used.

Throughput accounting improves profit performance with better management decisions by using measurements that more closely reflect the effect of decisions on three critical monetary variables (throughput, inventory, and operating expense — defin…