Skip to main content

Mandatory Cost Audits

Two articles from the news alerts on the MA Blog that caught my attention Mandatory Cost Accounting Norms Revised and Russia's Latest Bad habit.

The first article

The ministry of corporate affairs has started reviewing the way it orders mandatory cost audits on companies to optimise the coverage of each of the 44 sectors for which it has notified norms for keeping cost records.

In many sectors, cost audit data is used by the government for decisions related to pricing, excise duty, income-tax and in calculating the injury suffered by the domestic industry due to dumping. The audits also reveal the extent of efficiency and profitability of a company as well as the sector"

And the second article has

Only a few things are absolutely inevitable in today's world: death, taxes, and the Russian government's lusting after energy projects once they've been developed by Western companies."

The thoughts that come to my mind are:

  • Is Cost Audit only for large corporations ?
  • Is government using cost audit information to control the companies ?
  • Does the government use the information to design its policies ? Or
  • Cost Audit information helps the govt. to tax organised industries dear ? Cost/benefit to collect taxes from the unorganised industry is uneconomical.
Cost audit of large companies is imperative.... otherwise they would take the public for a ride.

My concern is why the government ignores the unorganised sector in forming the Cost Audit Rules even they are quite large. Although difficult, the government and public has to make the unorganised sector to promote good accounting practises.

One way is by encourage them to pool together and become a company or encouraging companies with tax subsidy to enter into that sector. The unorganised sectors that affect the common man are not covered by cost audit. Look at the retail sector that is under decision these days.

My question is - whether there is a political will in India to encourage all the industries to move towards making them a corporate entities. As they come under Companies Act, they that sector will be easier to manage. For e.g. local transport (taxis and auto) are run by individuals and managed by unions. Why not encourage them to form a company ? In developed countries taxi services by companies and they are lot better !!! To give examples Tata Salt, Cello pens, edible oils... Fifteen years back, these products in these sectors were rubbish.

Coming back to the point, India has to be organised in all sectors....this would promote good financial reporting and management accounting. Then the government will be able make proper decisions about pricing and taxation for all sectors in the economy. Otherwise India public will always be paying more for everything.


Santosh Puthran

  1. Tax Cuts - Simple Lessons in Economics - Must read article
  2. India's Retail policy attacked


Popular posts from this blog

Poll : Does CIMA, UK qualification add value

Poll : Does pursuing CIMA, UK qualification add value to a member of ICWAI, India ? Vote on the poll and share your thoughts by commenting the blog. Poll: Vote here I feel that if you are a member of ICWAI and you pursue CIMA, UK qualification, you are not adding any value to your skills since you will be learning the same. Once you are qualified, you are still a Cost & Management Accountant but from UK. For an employer, I would still have same skills and training on Management Accounting. However if you pursue qualification like Company Secretary or CPA or ACCA , your skills are enhanced with the knowledge gained during training and passing of exams. After qualification, you are bound to follow the CPD programs of ICWAI and other institute. In competitive world, employer look for people with multiple skills. Which one promotes you as professional better against your name: AICWA, ACMA or AICWA, ACS or AICWA, CPA or AICWA, ACCA Widgets Regards, Santosh

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made. Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory. Areas of consequence: A Standard

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change : Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business) Misunderstanding (communication problems; inadequate information) Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work) Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to cha