Skip to main content

Non accountants for audit in South Africa

Will GOI be so pragmatic.I think this is high time for ICWAI to impress administrative ministries specially MCA and MOF of the importance of equal recognition of ICWAI members in the regulatory field and equal recognition for all attest functions. Read More

I also need to emphasis that the Auditing Profession Act does not preclude any one from conducting an audit. It simply specifies that in order for audit services to be provided by any firm or individual, such a firm or individual ought to be registered with the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors. The legislation seeks to level the playing field in this regard, but we are mindful of the needs for the highest professional standards that need to be maintained. I have also requested a comprehensive review of the entrance requirements in an endeavour to facilitate entry for persons who may have undertaken a route of study other than an accounting degree.

I therefore would urge SAIPA to ensure that it influences the processes with the Regulatory Board that are intended to allow for more professional bodies to be recognised. The recently promulgated Audit Professions Act is an example of our ongoing efforts to ensure better mechanisms to strengthen our corporate governance, responsibility and accountability. Not only does this Act protect and define the role and functions of registered auditors, but it also seeks to ensure the integrity, reliability and validity of the attest function they perform.

We appreciated that in today’s more empowered world, we need to act decisively, as, in the words of Arthur Levitt, former Chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission Minister Trevor A Manuel, MP, Minister of Finance

Did you like the remain updated in Accountancy?
Subscribe to Management Accountant by Email

Related Posts

  1. Auditing in South Africa


Popular posts from this blog

Poll : Does CIMA, UK qualification add value

Poll : Does pursuing CIMA, UK qualification add value to a member of ICWAI, India ? Vote on the poll and share your thoughts by commenting the blog. Poll: Vote here I feel that if you are a member of ICWAI and you pursue CIMA, UK qualification, you are not adding any value to your skills since you will be learning the same. Once you are qualified, you are still a Cost & Management Accountant but from UK. For an employer, I would still have same skills and training on Management Accounting. However if you pursue qualification like Company Secretary or CPA or ACCA , your skills are enhanced with the knowledge gained during training and passing of exams. After qualification, you are bound to follow the CPD programs of ICWAI and other institute. In competitive world, employer look for people with multiple skills. Which one promotes you as professional better against your name: AICWA, ACMA or AICWA, ACS or AICWA, CPA or AICWA, ACCA Widgets Regards, Santosh

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made. Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory. Areas of consequence: A Standard

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change : Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business) Misunderstanding (communication problems; inadequate information) Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work) Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to cha