Skip to main content

Canada's Private Companies Need a Simplified Accounting Model

TORONTO, Dec. 12 /CNW/ - KPMG Enterprise(TM) today released the results of its recent survey of private business' financial reporting needs. The survey results confirm the long-standing view that private businesses in Canada need a simplified accounting model reflective of the different information needs of the limited users of their financial statements.

The positive news for Canada's accounting standard setters is that private businesses value the basic concepts of Canada's existing accounting framework, including the traditional historic cost measures of assets,liabilities, revenues and expenses. The ability to compare financial performance with others in the same industry is also important. However, there is less support for a number of recent developments in Canadian accounting standards including the evolution towards fair value measurements and disclosures. Further, there is only a limited perceived need to be able to benchmark financial performance against public companies or foreign companies.

The private sector believes that there is accounting standards overload and that existing differential reporting options, while important, are not adequate to alleviate this concern.

Click here to read more

  • Share your thoughts whether small companies in India need simple accounting model and reporting.
  • Should statutory audits be mandatory for small companies in India for e.g. companies with a turnover of less than Rs 5 crores (Rs 50 million)

Santosh Puthran
StumbleUpon My StumbleUpon Page

Did you like the post ?
Subscribe to Management Accountant by Email


Popular posts from this blog

Poll : Does CIMA, UK qualification add value

Poll : Does pursuing CIMA, UK qualification add value to a member of ICWAI, India ? Vote on the poll and share your thoughts by commenting the blog. Poll: Vote here I feel that if you are a member of ICWAI and you pursue CIMA, UK qualification, you are not adding any value to your skills since you will be learning the same. Once you are qualified, you are still a Cost & Management Accountant but from UK. For an employer, I would still have same skills and training on Management Accounting. However if you pursue qualification like Company Secretary or CPA or ACCA , your skills are enhanced with the knowledge gained during training and passing of exams. After qualification, you are bound to follow the CPD programs of ICWAI and other institute. In competitive world, employer look for people with multiple skills. Which one promotes you as professional better against your name: AICWA, ACMA or AICWA, ACS or AICWA, CPA or AICWA, ACCA Widgets Regards, Santosh

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made. Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory. Areas of consequence: A Standard

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change : Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business) Misunderstanding (communication problems; inadequate information) Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work) Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to cha