Skip to main content

The Term "Accountant" Should it be legally protected


The major accounting institutes in UK are gathering evidence from members in a bid to persuade the government to protect the title accountant.


In his blog, ICAEW chief executive Michael Izza said the CCAB institutes - ICAEW, ACCA, CIMA, CIPFA, and ICAS - were asking members to help back a bid to legally define the term accountant.

The CCAB bodies have long been trying to persuade the government that people without proper qualifications should not be able to call themselves accountants.

The DTI had previously said that the term 'chartered accountant' was recognised in legislation.

Click here to read more

In my earlier post on Professional Body, I found an interesting definition to the term.

"A professional body or professional organization, also known as a professional association or professional society, is an organization, usually non-profit, that exists to further a particular profession, to protect both the public interest and the interests of professionals. The balance between these two may be a matter of opinion. On the one hand, professional bodies may act to protect the public by maintaining and enforcing standards of training and ethics in their profession. On the other hand, they may also act like a cartel or a labor union (trade union) for the members of the profession, though this description is commonly rejected by the body concerned."

Share your thoughts on Mr. Michael Izza ideas about legally protecting the term "Accountant" and definition of professional body. The term "Chartered Accountant" is legally recognised in UK since it is accorded by Royal Charter.

Vote




Regards,

Santosh Puthran
StumbleUpon My StumbleUpon Page

Did you like the post ?
Subscribe to Management Accountant by Email

You will also like to read



  1. Definition of Professional Body

  2. Rivalry in Professional Services

  3. Accountancy news June 10, 2007

  4. ICWAI applies for name change

  5. ICAI's new logo for its member


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made. Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory. Areas of consequence: A Standard

Poll : Does CIMA, UK qualification add value

Poll : Does pursuing CIMA, UK qualification add value to a member of ICWAI, India ? Vote on the poll and share your thoughts by commenting the blog. Poll: Vote here I feel that if you are a member of ICWAI and you pursue CIMA, UK qualification, you are not adding any value to your skills since you will be learning the same. Once you are qualified, you are still a Cost & Management Accountant but from UK. For an employer, I would still have same skills and training on Management Accounting. However if you pursue qualification like Company Secretary or CPA or ACCA , your skills are enhanced with the knowledge gained during training and passing of exams. After qualification, you are bound to follow the CPD programs of ICWAI and other institute. In competitive world, employer look for people with multiple skills. Which one promotes you as professional better against your name: AICWA, ACMA or AICWA, ACS or AICWA, CPA or AICWA, ACCA Amazon.co.uk Widgets Regards, Santosh

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change : Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business) Misunderstanding (communication problems; inadequate information) Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work) Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to cha