Skip to main content

Corporate Goverance in the UK

Corporate governance is the process by which companies are controlled and directed - a company's board is ultimately responsible for this. The key to good corporate governance is having the right strategy, leadership and control structures in place to produce and sustain the delivery of value to shareholders.

Good corporate governance, and its visibility, gives confidence to all associated with a company that it is being managed well and that value is being created. Our objective in this report is to summarise the key elements of the Company's governance structure and relate this to the principles in the UK 's Combined Code on Corporate Governance – a code of good practice for listed companies.


"Every company should be headed by an effective board, which is collectively responsible for the success of the company." Combined Code – Main Principle A.1


"There should be a clear division of responsibilities at the head of the company between the running of the board and the executive responsibility for the running of the company's business. No one individual should have unfettered powers of decision." Combined Code – Main Principle A.2


"The Board should include a balance of executive and non-executive directors (and in particular independent non-executive directors) such not no individual or small group of individuals can dominate the board's decision making." Combined Code – Main Principle A.3


"There should be a formal rigorous and transparent procedure for the appointment of new directors to the board." Combined Code - Main Principle A.4


"The Board should be supplied in a timely manner with information in a form and of a quality to enable it to discharge its duties. All Directors should receive induction on joining the board and should regularly update and refresh their skills and knowledge." Combined Code - Main Principle A.5

Source: Chicks drinking


"The Board should undertake a formal and rigorous annual evaluation of its own performance and that of its committees and individual directors." Combined Code - Main Principle A.6


"All directors should be submitted for re-election at regular intervals, subject to continued satisfactory performance. The board should ensure planned and progressive refreshing of the board." Combined Code - Main Principle A.7


"The board should present a balanced and understandable assessment of the company's position and prospects." Combined Code - Main Principle C.1


" The board should maintain a sound system of internal controls to safeguard shareholders' investments and the company's assets." Combined Code - Main Principle C.2


"There should be a dialogue with shareholders based on the mutual understanding of objectives. The Board as a whole has responsibility for ensuring that a satisfactory dialogue with shareholders takes place. Combined Code" – Main Principle D.1


The board should establish formal and transparent arrangements for considering how they should apply the financial reporting and internal control principles and for maintaining an appropriate relationship with the company's auditors. Combined Code Main principle C.3

Do you like to be updated in Accountancy ?

Subscribe to Management Accountant by Email


Subscribe in a reader

SAP Store, UK

Are you looking for something ? You will find it in MA Stores - Powered By Amazon

US Stores
UK Stores
Digital Stores, US

You may also like to read
  1. Combined Code of Corporate Governance
  2. Honda 50cc Bike - Imposed Strategy
  3. Red Monkey Innovation
  4. World's 50 most innovative companies
  5. Resistance to Change
  6. Strategic Drift
  7. Strategic Development
  8. Books of Mintzberg on Amazon
  9. Books of Philip Kotler
  10. Porter's Diamond
  11. Understanding Three Stages of Change

  1. Corporate Governance - BAE website
  2. Corporate Governance - Invensys website
  3. Corporate Governance - Wikipedia


Popular posts from this blog

Poll : Does CIMA, UK qualification add value

Poll : Does pursuing CIMA, UK qualification add value to a member of ICWAI, India ? Vote on the poll and share your thoughts by commenting the blog. Poll: Vote here I feel that if you are a member of ICWAI and you pursue CIMA, UK qualification, you are not adding any value to your skills since you will be learning the same. Once you are qualified, you are still a Cost & Management Accountant but from UK. For an employer, I would still have same skills and training on Management Accounting. However if you pursue qualification like Company Secretary or CPA or ACCA , your skills are enhanced with the knowledge gained during training and passing of exams. After qualification, you are bound to follow the CPD programs of ICWAI and other institute. In competitive world, employer look for people with multiple skills. Which one promotes you as professional better against your name: AICWA, ACMA or AICWA, ACS or AICWA, CPA or AICWA, ACCA Widgets Regards, Santosh

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made. Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory. Areas of consequence: A Standard

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change : Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business) Misunderstanding (communication problems; inadequate information) Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work) Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to cha