Skip to main content

Business, Customer Value, Cost and Management Accounting

This is a guest post by CMA Devarajan Swaminathan. He has over 10 years post qualification experience in Accounting, Auditing, Finance as well as Management Accounting. He is the proprietor of Devarajan Swaminathan & Co - Cost Accountants.
View CMA.Devarajan Swaminathan's LinkedIn profileView CMA.Devarajan Swaminathan's profile
My understanding of a BUSINESS: Back to basics
There is a customer: He has money
I am the supplier: I have the product.
The aim is to sell him my product in return for his money.
A business is not and cannot be more complicated than this. Everything revolves around this.
To do the above I have spent resources like financial, technical, physical, human to bring the product first at my doorstep and then to the customers doorstep. My aim is to sell my product and in turn take his money. The difference what we call PROFIT, is actually my earnings for (a) the efforts I have put (b) the risk I have taken.
How well I do the above is what holds the key to the success or failure of a business ?
The above is true when my product will sell. How about a scenario where my product does not sell? Not because there is no demand but because some one else sells the same or better product better than me and at a better price. I stand to loose the customer. This brings out the question what is the true value of my product and what is the true value of my customer.

PROFIT: Determined by the complex interplay of value, price and cost and its maximization are what every business tries to achieve. In other words maximization of the shareholders wealth, ROI and so on and so forth. The issue how does one go about doing this?
The reason for so much importance to the compliance is because of more and more weightage given to enhancing shareholder value rather than enhancing customer value. Although the irony its customer value that's creating shareholder value. The sales value declared in the financial are taken for granted without any thought on how and why the sales value has been arrived at.

  • What is driving the sales?

  • We have a measurement of the shareholder value with all those EBIDTA, EPS, PV, ROI ratios. All these are meaningless unless we measure customer.

  • Do we have a measurement of CUSTOMER VALUE?

  • Cost based pricing and price based costing in my opinion are both insufficient.It should be customer value based costing and pricing.

In my opinion Customer value comes into play not when they are there but when they are not there. Most of the time the customer is taken for granted. Ask Dunlop tyres where they goofed up? Ask Mukand Steel where they goofed up? In fact we need to ask all those companies that were either closed down or are in the verge of closing down and the reason for the same. As the scale of operations increase the customer value increases significantly. E.g. I put a plant and mobilize resources to take my product to my customer for Rs. 10 billion. Tomorrow another player enters the market with a better product and better delivery capability due to which I loose my customers and my business, what is my loss, is my customer value.

Customer value is not the PROFIT per customer that I WOULD have earned but the LOSS per customer that I WILL incur if they are not there/ i loose them. How do I come down to a unit value is based on the capacity built up to serve customers. How well (efficiently and effectively) I either structure the Rs.10 billion or the customer base or both is what determines the cost, the premium that the customer is willing to pay for my product (which is based on his perception of the product value i.e. brand, quality, service, performance, resale value etc) is what sets my premium / margin and the addition of the two is my Price. This significantly varies between market segments. The day the business goofs up on cost structuring (which is a good quality product taken to the customer in the best possible manner and quickest possible time) and customer perception it's got to loose both the customer and value.

The shareholders expectations is taken care by the generalists and compliance oriented accounting. In terms of money received, deployed and returns generated and reported. We as management accountants need to shift our focus from shareholders and bring it to customers for the sake of shareholders because business revolves around customers and not shareholders. Interests of shareholders are taken care automatically when the interests of the customers are taken care of. Vice versa is not true.

Management accountants as bean growers need to be customer/ business centric and focused. Strategy is how best I can add and create value to my customers and thereby my shareholders using management accounting tools and techniques. To do all that I have said above one needs to focus on management accounting, customer measurement, cost measurement, cost management and cost control. Once the focus shifts to customer value and cost, other things revolving what determines cost (i.e. financial, physical, technical and human resources) are automatically addressed to, managed and maximized. It thus adds value to the needs of the customer which in turn adds value to the shareholders.

Just a thought.

Your value additional thoughts, opinions, perspective solicited.


CMA.Devarajan Swaminathan
Devarajan Swaminathan & Co.
Cost and Management Accountants

Do you like to be updated in Accountancy ?
Subscribe to Management Accountant by Email


Subscribe in a reader
SAP Store, UK

Visit MA Stores ? You will find something you are looking for ....

You may also like to read
  1. Activity Based Management - Dispelling the myths Par I - 13-June-08
  2. Activity Based Management - How to collect info 10-June-08
  3. 10 myths about ABC by SSRK 26-Nov-06
  4. Transfer Pricing 29-Dec-06
  5. Throughput Accounting 17-Dec-06
  6. SSRK's Knowledge Repository 03-Dec-06
  7. Stakeholder Analysis 19-May-08
  8. Resistance to Change 26-Apr-08
  9. Strategy Development 05-Apr-08
  10. Strategic Drift 12-Apr-08
  11. How to Share Blog posts with friends 25-May-08
  12. Management Accountant Blog Home


Popular posts from this blog

Poll : Does CIMA, UK qualification add value

Poll : Does pursuing CIMA, UK qualification add value to a member of ICWAI, India ? Vote on the poll and share your thoughts by commenting the blog. Poll: Vote here I feel that if you are a member of ICWAI and you pursue CIMA, UK qualification, you are not adding any value to your skills since you will be learning the same. Once you are qualified, you are still a Cost & Management Accountant but from UK. For an employer, I would still have same skills and training on Management Accounting. However if you pursue qualification like Company Secretary or CPA or ACCA , your skills are enhanced with the knowledge gained during training and passing of exams. After qualification, you are bound to follow the CPD programs of ICWAI and other institute. In competitive world, employer look for people with multiple skills. Which one promotes you as professional better against your name: AICWA, ACMA or AICWA, ACS or AICWA, CPA or AICWA, ACCA Widgets Regards, Santosh

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made. Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory. Areas of consequence: A Standard

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change : Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business) Misunderstanding (communication problems; inadequate information) Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work) Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to cha