Skip to main content

Infosys to buy UK consultancy Axon

Infosys to buy UK consultancy Axon in £407m deal

The headline Infosys acquiring AxonGlobal came as a surprise to when I read the news on Timesonline. Indian companies are cash rich and they are taking over other companies in the world to improve the line of business and service offerings.

"Mr Gopalakrishnan of Infosys insisted that there was still strong demand for SAP systems, with Infosys registering a 62 per cent increase in orders in the past year. He added that the deal would allow Infosys to compete more effectively on the international stage with rivals such as Accenture, Oracle and Cap Gemini. Around half of Axon’s revenue comes from the United States. “Our rationale was that with this acquisition, our global reach, scale and our ability to participate in large transformational deals would be significantly enhanced,” he said. "


This is a good example of Porter's Five Forces Model for assessing Assessing the Balance of Power in a Business Situation. Buying one of the competitors means "Eliminating a threat ". This will further the business objective in an intense competitive environment.
Infosys in India (images)
Source: Spinellis

Going back to origins of Axon Global:

Axon was set up by Mr Hunter in 1994 after he left his job with SAP to create a team of IT specialists. The company floated in 1999 and today generates more than £200 million a year from its base in Egham, Surrey. Its customer base includes Kraft Foods, BP and Microsoft, as well as public sector clients such as Transport for London and Wolverhampton City Council.

Now Mr. Hunter and his team will be richer by £ 407 million for the enterprising decision they took way back in 1994.

Every takeover brings about a cultural change in the acquired organisation. Scenario

Pre-acquisition:

  • Axon Global business is primarily SAP and the consultants (employees) would have enjoyed a growth in salaries with the growth in market.
  • Management takes decisions quickly since they are focussed in one line of business. Moreover the profitability were not much of concern since the projects were either less profitable or more profitable.

Post Acquisition

  • Infosys will be able to knock on the doors of their customers with Axon expertise on SAP solutions. This would generate more revenue overall
  • Infosys is a large organisation with many lines of business. So policy decision will be made taking into all the line of business into account.
  • The name Axon may disappear from the market place with SAP offerings will be one of the line of business.

I am not sure whether Axon employees will be benefited by the takeover since Infosys is quite conservative in salaries and but focusses more on benefits. Infosys has a socialist culture. So it would be interesting to watch how Infosys retains the Axon employees who were accustomed to get good salary rises every year.

Congratulation Mr. Hunter on the deal. You should have good holidays in Bahamas.

Regards,



Santosh Puthran


Visit SAP Book Stores

United States and World Wide

United Kingdom


Post Accountancy Jobs on Management Accountant Job Board

Join Management Accountant Groups



Do you like to be updated in Accountancy ?

Subscribe to Management Accountant by Email

Or

Subscribe in a reader

SAP Store, UK


Visit MA Stores ? You will find something you are looking for ....


Management Accountant Store, US - Powered by Amazon
Management Accountant Store, UK Stores - Powered by Amazon, UK
Digital Store, US


You may also like to read

  1. Business, Customer Value & Management Accounting 19-June-08
  2. Activity Based Management - Dispelling the myths Par I - 13-June-08
  3. Activity Based Management - How to collect info 10-June-08
  4. Combined Code on CG - Appointment of Directors 02-April-08
  5. Sustainable Development
  6. Requirement Analysis
  7. Transfer Pricing 29-Dec-06
  8. Throughput Accounting 17-Dec-06
  9. SSRK's Knowledge Repository 03-Dec-06
  10. Stakeholder Analysis 19-May-08
  11. Resistance to Change 26-Apr-08
  12. Strategy Development 05-Apr-08
  13. Strategic Drift 12-Apr-08
  14. How to Share Blog posts with friends 25-May-08
  15. Management Accountant Blog Home

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Throughput Accounting

Throughput accounting (TA) is an alternative to cost accounting proposed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt. It is not based on Standard Costing or Activity Based Costing (ABC). Throughput Accounting is not costing and it does not allocate costs to products and services. It can be viewed as business intelligence for profit maximization. Conceptually throughput accounting seeks to increase the velocity at which products move through an organization by eliminiating bottlenecks within the organization.


Cost (or Management) accounting is an organization's internal method used to measure efficiency. Since no one outside the organization uses such internal accounts for investment or other decisions, any methods that an organization finds helpful can be used.


Throughput accounting improves profit performance with better management decisions by using measurements that more closely reflect the effect of decisions on three critical monetary variables (throughput, inventory, and operating expense — defin…

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made.

Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory.


Areas of consequence:
A Standard Costing

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations.
According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change: Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business)Misunderstanding(communication problems; inadequate information)Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work)Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to change: Education and Communication - Where there is a lack…