Skip to main content

Beyond Budgeting


A radical proposition? - From The Beyond Budgeting Round Table (BBRT)

Budgeting, as most corporations practice it, should be abolished. That may sound like a radical proposition, but it is merely the final (and decisive) action in a long running battle to change organizations from centralized hierarchies to devolved networks. Most of the other building blocks are in place. Firms have invested huge sums in quality programs, IT networks, process reengineering, and a range of management tools including EVA, balanced scorecards, and activity accounting. But they are unable to establish the new order because the budget, and the command and control culture it supports, remains predominant.

10 reasons why budgets cause problems:
  • Budgets are time consuming and expensive.
  • Budgets provide poor value to users.
  • Budgets fail to focus on shareholder value.
  • Budgets are too rigid and prevent fast response.
  • Budgets protect rather than reduce costs.
  • Budgets stifle product and strategy innovation.
  • Budgets focus on sales targets rather than customer satisfaction.
  • Budgets are divorced from strategy.
  • Budgets reinforce a dependency culture.
  • Budgets lead to unethical behaviour.
There are twelve principles (two sets of six) that govern the Beyond Budgeting Model. One set relates to adaptive management processes and the other set relates to a devolved leadership.

Process Principles

The six principles of managing with adaptive processes are as follows:
  1. Goals - set aspirational relative goals for continuous improvement, don't negotiate fixed contracts
  2. Rewards - reward shared success based on relative performance, not on fixed targets
  3. Planning - make planning a continuous and inclusive process, not an annual event
  4. Controls - base controls on relative KPIs and performance trends, not on variances against plan
  5. Resources - make resources available as needed, not through annual budget allocations
  6. Coordination - coordinate interactions dynamically, not through annual planning cycles
The results of applying these principles include setting aspirational goals, reducing gaming, encouraging ambitious strategies and fast response, reducing waste, improving customer service, and promoting learning and ethical behaviour.

Leadership Principles

The evidence from our cases is that there are six principles that leaders should adopt:

  1. Outcomes - focus everyone on the outcomes, not on hierarchical realtionships
  2. Processes - organize as a lean network of accountatble teams, not as centralized functions
  3. Autonomy - give teams the freedom and capability to act, don't micro-manage them
  4. Responsibility - create a high responsibility culture at every level, not just at the centre
  5. Transparency - promote open information for self-management, don't restrict it hierarchically
  6. Governance - Adopt a few clear values, goals and boundaries, not detailed regulations
The effects of these principles include: a clear governance framework leads to the acceptance of local decision making by front-line teams throughout the organization; a high-performance climate leads to sustained competitive success; the freedom to decide fosters innovation and responsiveness; team-based responsibility results in a greater focus on creating value and reducing waste; customer accountability builds more commitment to satisfying customers profitably; and finally, an information culture based on openness and "one truth" promotes ethical behaviour.

SAS can assist with the implementation of these principles as follows:

  • Target setting - obtain information on competitor activity and link to external databases
  • Strategy - make the update and maintenance of objectives and targets an easy process
  • Growth and improvement - build hypotheses and scenarios and test against capabilities
  • Resource management - track the life time cost and value of resources
  • Coordination - search for and use cause and effect relationships across business units and processes
  • Cost management - identify areas of cost which need attention through analysis (eg. Activity Based Costing) and data mining
  • Forecasting - create and maintain rolling forecasts
  • Measurement and control - implement a balanced scorecard with leading and lagging indicators
  • Rewards - track actual performance against targets
  • Delegation - maintain personal information portals.

SAS is the only software supplier that is capable of collecting, transforming, modelling, analysing and supporting the complex information needs of organisations. Our flexible framework adapts technology to the management processes - not the other way around.

Sources:

  1. Beyond Budgeting
  2. SAS - Superior Software that gives you power to know

Do you like to be updated in Accountancy ?

Subscribe to Management Accountant by Email


Or




Subscribe in a reader

SAP Store, UK

Visit MA Stores ? You will find something you are looking for ....

Management Accountant Store, US - Powered by Amazon
Management Accountant Store, UK Stores - Powered by Amazon, UK
Digital Store, US

You may also like to read

  1. Emerging Role of Management Accountants
  2. Cultural Web - A big challenge 22-June-08
  3. Activity Based Management - Dispelling the myths Part I - 13-June-08
  4. Activity Based Management - How to collect info 10-June-08
  5. 10 myths about ABC by SSRK 26-Nov-06
  6. Transfer Pricing 29-Dec-06
  7. Throughput Accounting 17-Dec-06
  8. SSRK's Knowledge Repository 03-Dec-06
  9. Stakeholder Analysis 19-May-08
  10. Resistance to Change 26-Apr-08
  11. Strategy Development 05-Apr-08
  12. Strategic Drift 12-Apr-08
  13. How to Share Blog posts with friends 25-May-08
  14. Management Accountant Blog Home
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made.

Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory.


Areas of consequence:
A Standard Costing

Throughput Accounting

Throughput accounting (TA) is an alternative to cost accounting proposed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt. It is not based on Standard Costing or Activity Based Costing (ABC). Throughput Accounting is not costing and it does not allocate costs to products and services. It can be viewed as business intelligence for profit maximization. Conceptually throughput accounting seeks to increase the velocity at which products move through an organization by eliminiating bottlenecks within the organization.


Cost (or Management) accounting is an organization's internal method used to measure efficiency. Since no one outside the organization uses such internal accounts for investment or other decisions, any methods that an organization finds helpful can be used.


Throughput accounting improves profit performance with better management decisions by using measurements that more closely reflect the effect of decisions on three critical monetary variables (throughput, inventory, and operating expense — defin…

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations.
According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change: Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business)Misunderstanding(communication problems; inadequate information)Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work)Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to change: Education and Communication - Where there is a lack…