Skip to main content

Tier based Accountancy Practice in India - Will it help

Background: Accounting bodies in India are based on UK accounting concept and their governance is more of less similar to the UK bodies.

The public accounting practise in India are mostly driven by compliance audits i.e. certification by accountants in submission of returns / documentation to government / public authorities. Unlike in the UK where the public accountants are more in advisory / outsourcing services rather than audit.

In professions like medicine you will find doctors based on their skills and expertise e.g. General Physician, Heart surgern or optician, ophthalmologist where the patient consult the doctors with right skills and expertise. However similar categorisation does not exist in public practise of accountancy in India.

Public accountants in India like Chartered Accountants / Cost Accountants or Company Secretary can undertake accountancy / audit work for any client irrespective of size of the client ie. small company or large company or partnership or level of expertise of the work audit, compliance audit like tax audit / excise audit, corporate finance, corporate recovery, forensic, tax, people services, transaction services, and risk advisory.

Majority of Accounting firms in India are small in size and they are plenty in number. The public practise is primarily driven by the government notification and compliance services. So they would not like to come out of the comfort zone and their accounting bodies lobby with the government to get such.Moreover there is little incentive for them to go for advisory or consulting assignments since that would involve skills and expertise and continue to do what they are doing.

The advisory / consulting practise assignments are done by Big 4 accountancy firms (who call themselves as network of firms) or large accounting firms and their skills / expertise are continually enhanced as they work at multinational level.

The pointers to my thoughts are whether the regulating bodies in India are addressing the current issues faced by various stakeholders ?
  • India has an extremely low ratio of one CA for every 9,000 persons - Mr Rahul Roy. How it can be addressed ?
  • Indian businesses are increasingly being organised. Look around you will find Shopping Malls, freight companies, courier companies etc which 20 years earlier was run by government or sole proprietors.
  • The government is issuing notifications every other day for certification of documents to be submitted to government authorities. Is it the time to have an accountants with lesser expertise who can perform certifications.
  • Certified Accounting Technician courses by ICAI/ICWAI. ICAI has attempted to convert the Inter CAs to CAT. What is the benefit of CAT qualification to the holder of the qualification. Can he practise ?
  • Will the users of accounting services benefit when there is a tier in practitioners of accounting services. (A parallel example, you can go to an optician for checking whether you have number in your eye, but you go to ophthalmologist better guidance due to his expertise in the area).
  • Is there a classification of accountants in practise based on expertise, so that you as a member of public know who to go for a service ?
  • Are you happy with how the accounting profession is regulated in India ? Do you feel there are unregulated firms that provide accounting services can be brought under regulatory umbrella
  • Is there a need to have another accounting body who members would specialise in compliance based audits for government authorities
  • Will practising accountants oppose such changes ? What does Code of Ethics say ?
Is tier based accounting qualification / practise required for India benefit the public. Will it help to regulate the profession better.(Unregulated accountants offer book keeping services )


Tier 1 - Accounting Technician

They should be to provide book keeping services, filing minor returns to small companies

Tier 2 - Inter passed of CA/ICWAI - (For namesake let me call them Certified Accountants)

They would able provide accounting services for small/medium companies and can do compliance based audit prescribed by government authorities(selected audit assignments). They cannot offer advisory / consulting services. The skill/expertise required for compliance audit is less since it is question of applying the rules correctly.

To give an example: If you are asked to compute current ratio, then it is matter of applying formula. However whether current ratio 2.0 is appropriate for your company and industry then it would require expertise to comment since it will based on various factors.

Tier 3 - Fully qualified accountants like ICWA/CA/CS

They would provide services to medium / large companies offering full range of services work audit, compliance audit, corporate finance, corporate recovery, forensic, tax, people services, transaction services, and risk advisory. The focus of the practising firms should be able to go towards advisory services and would be able to compete with Big 4. (Just like Indian IT firms are competiting with MNCs).

A tier based structure for accounting qualification and practise in India would encourage more people to pursue accountancy. Each level of qualification would require passing of exams / practical training and membership. The practitioners should be regulated and monitored by an independent Public Oversight body.

And it will help to regulate the Accounting profession in India better. Moreover it would encourage the fully qualified accountants to raise the standards of public practice. With MRAs in place, it would help the Indian Accounting firms to open practises abroad.

I would invite your views on this subject keeping in mind the current issues / practises India is facing and solutions that would help to solve the problem (without referring to accounting bodies in UK/Australia/US where the business environment is capitalist).

Do you like to be updated in Accountancy ?

Click here to get updates by Email in your inbox


Subscribe in a reader

or Follow me on Twitter 

You may also like to read
  1. Professional Body
  2. Membership of an Accounting Body - Value Proposition
  3. Profession v/s Professionalism
  4. Accountancy Profession in India
  5. The word "Chartered" hot debate in India


Popular posts from this blog

Poll : Does CIMA, UK qualification add value

Poll : Does pursuing CIMA, UK qualification add value to a member of ICWAI, India ? Vote on the poll and share your thoughts by commenting the blog. Poll: Vote here I feel that if you are a member of ICWAI and you pursue CIMA, UK qualification, you are not adding any value to your skills since you will be learning the same. Once you are qualified, you are still a Cost & Management Accountant but from UK. For an employer, I would still have same skills and training on Management Accounting. However if you pursue qualification like Company Secretary or CPA or ACCA , your skills are enhanced with the knowledge gained during training and passing of exams. After qualification, you are bound to follow the CPD programs of ICWAI and other institute. In competitive world, employer look for people with multiple skills. Which one promotes you as professional better against your name: AICWA, ACMA or AICWA, ACS or AICWA, CPA or AICWA, ACCA Widgets Regards, Santosh

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made. Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory. Areas of consequence: A Standard

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change : Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business) Misunderstanding (communication problems; inadequate information) Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work) Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to cha