Skip to main content

The Audit Firm Governance Code UK

The Audit Firm Governance Code applies to eight audit firms that together audit about 95% of the companies listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange.

The Audit Firm Governance Code, published in January 2010, applies to eight audit firms that together audit about 95% of the companies listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. For these firms, the code sets a benchmark for good governance which other audit firms may wish to voluntarily adopt in full or in part.

The reputations that the audit firms have built upon their licence to audit are of vital public interest. One way in which they can maintain public trust in their brands is by being seen as exemplars of best practice governance.In this context, it is however important to recognise that the governance challenges faced by audit firms are different from those faced by listed companies.

In drawing on aspects of the UK Corporate Governance Code such as the comply or explain approach, the Audit Firm Governance Code establishes the principle that audit firms should appoint independent non-executives within their governance structure.

It also codifies much existing good practice and links to matters that audit firms must comply with as regulated professional partnerships.

Full details on ICAEW, UK website.

Do you like to be updated in Accountancy ?


Click here to get updates by Email in your inbox

Or

Subscribe in a reader

or Follow me on Twitter 


You may also like to read
  1. Canada CA offer guidance on IFRS changeover
  2. IASB Framework - Financial Statements
  3. Selecting an Audit Firm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Throughput Accounting

Throughput accounting (TA) is an alternative to cost accounting proposed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt. It is not based on Standard Costing or Activity Based Costing (ABC). Throughput Accounting is not costing and it does not allocate costs to products and services. It can be viewed as business intelligence for profit maximization. Conceptually throughput accounting seeks to increase the velocity at which products move through an organization by eliminiating bottlenecks within the organization.


Cost (or Management) accounting is an organization's internal method used to measure efficiency. Since no one outside the organization uses such internal accounts for investment or other decisions, any methods that an organization finds helpful can be used.


Throughput accounting improves profit performance with better management decisions by using measurements that more closely reflect the effect of decisions on three critical monetary variables (throughput, inventory, and operating expense — defin…

Learning Curve Theory

Learning Curve Theory is concerned with the idea that when a new job, process or activity commences for the first time it is likely that the workforce involved will not achieve maximum efficiency immediately. Repetition of the task is likely to make the people more confident and knowledgeable and will eventually result in a more efficient and rapid operation. Eventually the learning process will stop after continually repeating the job. As a consequence the time to complete a task will initially decline and then stabilise once efficient working is achieved. The cumulative average time per unit is assumed to decrease by a constant percentage every time that output doubles. Cumulative average time refers to the average time per unit for all units produced so far, from and including the first one made.

Major areas within management accounting where learning curve theory is likely to have consequences and suggest potential limitations of this theory.


Areas of consequence:
A Standard Costing

Resistence to Change - Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger

The Six (6) Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger is a model to prevent, decrease or minimize resistance to change in organizations.
According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that certain people are resisting change: Parochial self-interest (some people are concerned with the implication of the change for themselves ad how it may effect their own interests, rather than considering the effects for the success of the business)Misunderstanding(communication problems; inadequate information)Low tolerance to change (certain people are very keen on security and stability in their work)Different assessments of the situation (some employees may disagree on the reasons for the change and on the advantages and disadvantages of the change process) Kotter and Schlesinger set out the following six (6) change approaches to deal with this resistance to change: Education and Communication - Where there is a lack…